(Hamilton, Alexander, or James Madison. Federalist No. 51: "The Structure of the Government Must Furnish the Proper Checks and Balances Between the Different Departments." New York Packet, February 8, 1788.)
Federalist 51 was written by James Madison. Through this document contained inside of the Federalist Papers, Madison explained why it was necessary that we shall maintain the division of powers among the several departments talked about in the Constitution. This way the departments throughout the government would be able to keep each other in their proper positions. In order to keep a national government that controls itself and its citizens, the legislative authority must be divided into different parts by different methods of election and principles of action so their specific functions will be fulfilled. Federalist 51 contests the sources we read in class today, for example Document G: Brutus No. 1, October 18, 1878 states that, "In a republic,the manners, sentiments, and interests of the people should be similar. If this be not the case, there will be a constant clashing of opinions; and the representatives will be constantly striving against those of the other." (PP 2) The Anti-Federalists believed that because of the legislature's large size and way of government will cause all types of tensions and problems, that would neither be successful or self-sufficient. With James Madison's writing, the main reason the legislative department was split up so that each department has the right to check and balance each other. No group of congress inside of the legislature has the entitlement to more power, they must work together peacefully to spread out the opinions of the people to create the right laws and keep their needs in mind.
Federalist 51 provides us a opinion on the Constitution that fully explains why the legislature was split into two, without such a figurative and complex type of writing that keeps it honest and clear. Despite the explanation, it only gives us what one person thought about checks and balances. We need breadth, a variety of opinions on checks and balances to fully understand what the whole of the United States thought about this system at the time.
Thursday, December 13, 2012
Monday, November 26, 2012
The American Revolution: The Arts and Entertainment
Example of boycott: The Boston Tea Party |
Yankee Doodle |
Wednesday, November 14, 2012
Annotated Bibliography: Common Sense
Hakim, Joy. "From Thomas Paine, Common Sense." A History of US : Sourcebook and Index. Vol. 11. New York: Oxford UP, 1999. 31-37. Print.
In this document called Common Sense, the author, Thomas Paine is discussing the reasons why the colonists should join the resistance against Great Britain. He begins a long discussion of the purpose of America, and if the colonists would continue to be "attached" to Great Britain, there would be much larger conflicts. The document supports and extends the Declaration of Independence because Thomas Paine talks about how government does not last quite long and would eventually need to be removed after several abuses by those in charge. Common Sense by Thomas Paine would allow us to see the colonist's perspective in our study of the American Revolution but we would need to see all perspectives to fully grasp the causes of the American Revolution. We as students need to see breadth to have a wide range of knowledge, not just this document as a whole.
In this document called Common Sense, the author, Thomas Paine is discussing the reasons why the colonists should join the resistance against Great Britain. He begins a long discussion of the purpose of America, and if the colonists would continue to be "attached" to Great Britain, there would be much larger conflicts. The document supports and extends the Declaration of Independence because Thomas Paine talks about how government does not last quite long and would eventually need to be removed after several abuses by those in charge. Common Sense by Thomas Paine would allow us to see the colonist's perspective in our study of the American Revolution but we would need to see all perspectives to fully grasp the causes of the American Revolution. We as students need to see breadth to have a wide range of knowledge, not just this document as a whole.
Saturday, October 27, 2012
Colonial Societies: Culture in America
The New England Primer |
The Chesapeake Tobacco Plantations |
Monday, October 8, 2012
Annotated Bibliography: "Forgotten Founders" by Johansen
Johansen, Bruce E. Forgotten Founders: Benjamin Franklin, the Iroquois, and the Rationale for the American Revolution. Ipswich, MA: Gambit, 1982. Print.
In this section of "Forgotten Founders"by Johansen, he talks most about the effects of communication of Indian ideas and how those particular ideas affected the foundation of America. He explains all of the great things the Indian peoples gave to the incoming Pilgrims, along with his display of certain bias' and ideas from historians that agree with the topic of interest. But although this piece of text gives you extra information about the Native peoples and how they affected America, it contains a specific bias that eventually overpowers the text making it hard for the reader to gain breadth from other groups from the time period. The source could help us in our study of American Colonization by gaining information about what other things the Indian people gave to the foundation of America but it does contain a bias that effects the amount of new information we could possibly gain and what types of perspectives we could learn and acknowledge from this source.
In this section of "Forgotten Founders"by Johansen, he talks most about the effects of communication of Indian ideas and how those particular ideas affected the foundation of America. He explains all of the great things the Indian peoples gave to the incoming Pilgrims, along with his display of certain bias' and ideas from historians that agree with the topic of interest. But although this piece of text gives you extra information about the Native peoples and how they affected America, it contains a specific bias that eventually overpowers the text making it hard for the reader to gain breadth from other groups from the time period. The source could help us in our study of American Colonization by gaining information about what other things the Indian people gave to the foundation of America but it does contain a bias that effects the amount of new information we could possibly gain and what types of perspectives we could learn and acknowledge from this source.
Tuesday, September 25, 2012
Annotated Bibliography: "Of the Island of Hispanola" by de Las Casa
De Las Casa, Bartolome. "Of the Island of Hispanola." Very Brief Account of the Devastation of the Indies. Trans. Nigel Griffen, 1542. Print.
In this particular section of work from the Very Brief Account of the Devastation of the Indies, De Las Casa talks about how the Spaniards took over the island of Hispanola. He writes about the cruel actions the invading Spaniards used against the Natives, along with the slaughter that occurred. The document is written with De Las Casa's perspective in mind, it makes the Spaniards seem like heartless murderers who enjoy slaughtering Native populations. There isn't much information we can gain about the Spanish perspective on this particular event, the only information we can gain is from De Las Casa's perspective which doesn't allow that much argument. The document could help us learn one perspective on this event, but we need all perspectives to fully understand and analyze why this had happened. Having only one perspective limits our knowledge about the fall of Hispanola and it's Native peoples.
In this particular section of work from the Very Brief Account of the Devastation of the Indies, De Las Casa talks about how the Spaniards took over the island of Hispanola. He writes about the cruel actions the invading Spaniards used against the Natives, along with the slaughter that occurred. The document is written with De Las Casa's perspective in mind, it makes the Spaniards seem like heartless murderers who enjoy slaughtering Native populations. There isn't much information we can gain about the Spanish perspective on this particular event, the only information we can gain is from De Las Casa's perspective which doesn't allow that much argument. The document could help us learn one perspective on this event, but we need all perspectives to fully understand and analyze why this had happened. Having only one perspective limits our knowledge about the fall of Hispanola and it's Native peoples.
Thursday, September 20, 2012
Annotated Bibliography: Columbus' Diary
In his journal entry, Columbus writes about how his crew were getting restless on the ships but quickly brightened up at the signs of land. He also notes his first encounter with the Natives, who were clever and would make good servants. The entry is written in his perspective, he only notes his ideas and impressions on the Natives. There is not much information we can gain on the Natives besides his own opinions about these peoples. His entry can help us learn more about what his first impression on the Natives, and how it effected the way he treated them later on but with this entry, we can only learn from his opinion which limits our knowledge on the whole encounter.
Saturday, September 15, 2012
Pre-Columbian Societies: Different Kinds of Culture
Projectile Points |
Pueblos |
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)